Saturday, 27 February 2016

Ammonites

patterns-in-nature-01
Ammonites
 Pryitised ammonite from Charmouth 
Ammonites are perhaps the most widely known fossil, possessing the typically ribbed spiral-form shell as pictured above. These creatures lived in the seas between 240 - 65 million years ago, when they became extinct along with the dinosaurs. The name 'ammonite' (usually lower-case) originates from the Greek Ram-horned god called Ammon. Ammonites belong to a group of predators known as cephalopods, which includes their living relatives the octopus, squid, cuttlefish and nautilus. 
Ammonites began life as tiny planktonic creatures less than 1mm in diameter. In their infancy they would have been vulnerable to attack from other predators, including fish; however, they quickly assumed a strong protective outer shell that shielded their soft interior from damage. Evidence suggests that they gained in size rapidly, with females growing up to 400% larger than the males.
Nautilus shells comprise of individual chambers, each growing in size as the creature grows. These chambers are secreted by the creature at a rate of one every four weeks, equal to 13 each year. Using this as a guide an ammonite shell containing 26 chambers could be assumed to have housed the creature for two years. Like the nautilus, ammonites retained their original shell throughout their life. However it's worth noting that in comparison to modern day nautili which live in cold, deep water, ammonites preferred warm shallow waters and may have had a higher metabolism. Consequently, it's possible that ammonites could reach larger sizes far quicker than modern day nautili.
Ammonites were the predators of their time, feeding on most living marine creatures including molluscs, fish and even other cephalopods. By analogy to modern cephalopods, their method of attack probably comprised of silently stalking their prey, then rapidly extending their tentacles to grasp the target. Once caught the prey would be devoured by the ammonite's powerful jaws, located at the base of the tentacles, between the eyes.
Much of the ammonite's life was spent in shallow waters. The evidence to support this includes their diet, which could be found in the greatest volumes in the warm shallows. It is also unlikely that their shells could withstand the high pressures present in deep water (over 100 meters). Other theories based around their social behaviour suggest their shells were decorated by an array of patterns, indicating that colour/good light played a large part in their lives.



Logarithmic spiral


Cutaway of a nautilus shell showing the chambers arranged in an approximately logarithmic spiral. The plotted spiral (dashed blue curve) is based on growth rate parameter b = 0.1759


A logarithmic spiral, equiangular spiral or growth spiral is a self-similar spiral curve which often appears in nature. The logarithmic spiral was first described by Descartes and later extensively investigated by Jacob Bernoulli, who called it Spira mirabilis, "the marvelous spiral".
         Logarithmic spiral (pitch 10°)

Logarithmic spirals in nature

In several natural phenomena one may find curves that are close to being logarithmic spirals. Here follows some examples and reasons:
  • The approach of a hawk to its prey. Their sharpest view is at an angle to their direction of flight; this angle is the same as the spiral's pitch.
  • The approach of an insect to a light source. They are used to having the light source at a constant angle to their flight path. Usually the sun (or moon for nocturnal species) is the only light source and flying that way will result in a practically straight line. 
  • The arms of spiral galaxies. Our own galaxy, the Milky Way, has several spiral arms, each of which is roughly a logarithmic spiral with pitch of about 12 degrees. 
  • The nerves of the cornea (this is, corneal nerves of the subepithelial layer terminate near superficial epithelial layer of the cornea in a logarithmic spiral pattern). 
  • The bands of tropical cyclones, such as hurricanes.
  • Many biological structures including the shells of mollusks. In these cases, the reason may be construction from expanding similar shapes, as shown for polygonal figures in the accompanying graphic.
Logarithmic spiral beaches can form as the result of wave refraction and diffraction by the coast. Half Moon Bay (California) is an example of such a type of beach.

Some of my drawings where spirals were noted:
Thanks to Mark for bringing up this subject. I think another reason why seashells are so attractive and relaxing is they often follow algorithmic spiral or fractals-type self-similar curves. This pattern is found throughout the natural world and so it probably ties in with our deep sense of organic connection with the natural world. I would like to research on the therapeutic impact of spirals and curves. Can there be a truth behind this fact that connects to the feeling of comfort? 




Friday, 26 February 2016

Drawings and drawings and drawings..



 








 











All my videos from YouTube.

Walk Experiments: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TtmpFsfEdKU


Drawing Experiments : 1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EL-TqYycnRo 

                                         2.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YCbc5FRspsQ 

 

Painting Experiments : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JuduxCaDrNI

 

 



Rosalyn Driscoll- Tactile Artist

ARTIST'S STATEMENT: 

"My work explores the feeling of living in the body, which is subject to natural elements, forces and processes such as light, water, growth, decay, loss and gravity. My sculptures, installations and photographs speak to the bodily senses of proprioception, kinesthesia and touch. Body, self, nature, and art form a seamless continuum. The meanings and qualities of materials, whether manufactured, handmade or organic, are central to my work. Moving images and light are integrated into the structure and meaning of some work, further animating and transforming matter."

Marriage
MARRIAGE, 2015,rawhide, photographic foil,copper tubing, 13"by30"by17"


BiographyDriscoll began making art full-time following a major in art history at Smith College, then two years as curatorial assistant in the Asian department of the Yale University Art Gallery, followed by a year of study at Silvermine College of Art in Connecticut. Her early work in painting and drawing focused on the human body–merging the visible surface and underlying anatomical structures. She turned to hand-papermaking, initially working with Dieu Donne Paper and Press in New York, to make abstract handmade paper collages with texture and physical presence, using papers stained by submersion in a bog.
Interest in the body and presence led to sculptures that invited people to touch and that investigated touch as a way of knowing. She designed these works to be accessible for people with visual disabilities, yet found that touching could enrich everyone’s aesthetic experience. These early sculptures were small, architectonic and made of durable materials like wood, stone, steel and rope.
During a residency in Taos, New Mexico, at Helene Wurlitzer Foundation of New Mexico, she discovered rawhide, a material that allowed her to generate organic forms with physical and formal allusions to the body. These sculptures no longer invite actual touch, but evoke somatic, visceral feelings such as balance, pressure, motion and emotion. The translucence of rawhide led to integrating light into the sculptures, including neon and video. She collaborates with filmmakers in the US and the UK, projecting moving images onto the translucent rawhide sculptures, transforming both sculptures and images.
She continues to make sculptures as well as site-responsive installations, both indoors and outdoors. Her newest work explores water, and includes a collaboration with Springs Stewardship Institute in Arizona to bring attention to the biological, cultural importance of springs.
Driscoll is a member of Sensory Sites, an international collective based in London that generates exhibitions, installations and research that explore multi-sensory perception.
http://rosalyndriscoll.com/

Work in Progress..


I have been drawing a lot recently; this action gives me a soothing sense of making while I pondered over where I wanted to direct my project. One of my main objectives is to explore the relationship between gesture and vision.While researching on that, I discovered the artist Eric Conrad who seek sensation responses to the participants while involving technology. His research on waves and contemplation linking them with sensations/movement of the participant is so intriguing. (http://peripheralfocus.net/reading_a_wave/palomar.html) He claims that "The “mother of all senses”–touch is the sense which became differentiated into the others. The skin is the most ancient and largest sense organ of the body, yet few arts engage it directly. In his 1921 The Manifesto of Tactilism, Futurist Filippo T. Marinetti outlined a radical new “Art of Touch”". His ideas involving technology is in contrast from mine; however I am really interested in his bark rubbings and I have tried some of my own. I enjoyed the research obtained as the  sensation and impression changes while the speed and pressure of the pencil varies when making a rubbing over a texture.
 
 

I was reminded of the wrapping experiments of Caroline and did some of that too. I became more and more involved with playing with the idea of impression and creating the same sense of touch while in contact with the shells. 
The next experiment came out after much thought as I looked out for the best  material to "HOLD" these impressions. The best solution I found (until now) is soap as it is biodegradable;easy to hold (and also easily available) and the impressions are fabulous. Here is the experiment in pictures. I am planning to do more and to maybe present/associate them with the "Cabinet of Curiosities"..






The Manifesto of Tactilism by F.T. Marinetti Milan, 11 January 1921.

Read at the Theatre de I'Oeuvre (Paris), the World Exposition of Modern Art (Geneva), and published inComoedia in January 1921

Futurism, founded by us in Milan in 1909, gave to the world a hatred of the Museum, the Academy and Sentimentalism; it gave the world Action-Art, the defence of youth against all senility, the glorification of illogical and mad innovative genius, the artistic sensibility of mechanisation, of speed, of the music hall, and of the simultaneous interpenetration of modern life, words in freedom, plastic dynamism, noise-intoners, synthetic theatre. Futurism today redoubles its creative effort.

Last summer, at Antignano, where the street named after Amerigo Vespucci, discoverer of America, curvingly coasts along the sea, I invented Tactilism. Red flags waved from the workshops taken over by the workers. 

I was naked in the silky water that was torn by rocks, foamy scissors knives razors, among the iodine-filled mattresses of seaweed. I was nude in the sea of flexible steel, which had a fertile and virile breathing. I drank from the goblet of the sea filled to the rim with genius. The sun, with its long roasting flames, vulcanised my body and bolted the keel of my forehead rich with sails. A working-class boy, Who smelled of salt and hot stone, looked, smiling, at my first tactile board: 

 "Having fun making little boats?!" 

I answered: "Yes, I'm building a craft that will take the human spirit to unknown waters." Here are my reflections, the reflections of a swimmer: The unrefined and elemental majority of men came out of the Great War concerned only to conquer a greater material well-being. The minority, composed of artists and thinkers, sensitive and refined, instead displays the symptoms of a deep and mysterious ill that is probably a consequence of the great tragic exertion that the war imposed on humanity.

This illness displays, as symptoms, a sad listlessness, an excessively feminine neurasthenia, a hopeless pessimism, a feverish indecision of lost instincts, and an absolute lack of will.

The rough and elemental majority of men tumultuously hurls toward the revolutionary conquest of the Communist paradise and definitively storms the problem of happiness, convinced that it has solved it by satisfying all material needs and appetites.

The intellectual minority ironically scorns this breathless attempt, and no longer enjoying the ancient pleasures of Religion, of Art, of Love, which previously constituted its privilege and its shelter, brings life, which it no longer knows how to enjoy, to a cruel trial, and abandons itself to refined pessimism, sexual inversions, and to the artificial paradises of cocaine, opium, ether, etc. That majority and this minority both denounce Progress, Civilisation, the mechanical powers of Speed, of Comfort, of Hygiene, Futurism in short, as being responsible for their past, present, and future misfortunes.

Almost everyone proposes a return to a savage life, contemplative, slow, solitary, far from the hated cities. 

As for us Futurists, we who bravely face the agonising drama of the post-war period, we are in favour of all the revolutionary attacks that the majority will attempt. But, to the minority of artists and thinkers, we yell at the top of our lungs: Life is always right! The artificial paradises with which you attempt to murder her are useless. Stop dreaming of an absurd return to the savage life. Beware of condemning the superior powers of society and the marvels of speed. Heal, rather, the illness of the post-war period, giving humanity new and nutritious joys. Instead of destroying human throngs, it is necessary to perfect them. Intensify the communication and the fusion of human beings. Destroy the distances and the barriers that separate them in love and friendship. Give fullness and total beauty to these two essential manifestations of life: Love and Friendship.

In my careful and anti-traditional observations of all the erotic and sentimental phenomena that unite both sexes, and of the no-less-complex phenomena of friendship, I have understood that human beings speak to each other with their mouths and with their eyes, but do not manage a true sincerity because of the lack of sensitivity of the skin, which is still a mediocre conductor of thought. 

While eyes and voices communicate their essences, the senses of touch of two individuals communicate almost nothing in their clashes, intertwining, or rubbing. Thus, the need to transform the handshake, the kiss, and the coupling into continuous transmissions of thought.

I started by submitting my sense of touch to an intensive treatment, pinpointing the confused phenomena of will and thought on various points on my body, and especially on the palms of my hands. This training is slow but easy, and all healthy bodies can, through this training, give surprising and exact results.

On the other hand, unhealthy sensibilities, which draw their excitability and their apparent perfection from the very weakness of the body, will achieve great tactile power less easily, without duration or confidence. I have created a first educational scale of touch, which is, at the same time, a scale of tactile values for Tactilism, or the Art of Touch. 

First scale, level, with four different categories of touch.

First category: extremely confident touch, abstract, cold. 
Sandpaper, Silver-coated paper.

Second category: touch without heat, persuasive, reasoning.
Smooth silk, Silk crepe. 

Third category: exciting, lukewarm, nostalgic.
 Velvet, Wool from the Pyrenees,
 Wool, Silk-wool crepe.

Fourth category: almost irritating, hot, determined.
Granulous silk, Plaited silk, Spongy cloth.
Second scale, volumes

Fifth category: soft, hot, human.
Suede, Horsehair or dog hair, Human hair, Marabou. 

Sixth category: hot, sensual, spirited, affectionate.
This category has two branches:
Rough iron Soft brush, 
Sponge,
Wire brush,
Plush, Human or peach fuzz, 
Bird down.

Through this separation of tactile values, I have created: 

1. Simple tactile boards that I will present to the public in our contactilations or conferences on the Art of touch. 

I have arranged the previously catalogued tactile values in wise harmonic or antithetical combinations.

2. Abstract or suggestive tactile boards (hand journeys). These tactile boards have arrangements of tactile values that allow hands to wander over them, following coloured trails and experiencing a succession of suggestive sensations, whose rhythm, in turn languid, cadenced, or tumultuous, is regulated by exact directions.

One of these abstract tactile boards made by me, and that has as a title Sudan-Paris, contains, in the part representing Sudan, rough, greasy coarse, prickly, burning tactile values (spongy material, sponge, sandpaper, wool, brush, wire brush); in the part representing The Sea, there are slippery, metallic, fresh tactile values (silver-coated paper); in the part representing Paris, there are soft, delicate, caressing tactile values, hot and cold at the same time (silk, velvet, feathers, down).

3. Tactile boards for the opposite sexes.

 In these tactile boards, the arrangement of tactile values allows the hands of a man and a woman, tied together, to take a tactile journey together and evaluate it. These tactile boards are extremely varied, and the pleasure that they give is enriched by the harnessing of rival sensibilities, which will attempt to feel more acutely and better explain their rival sensations. These tactile boards are destined to replace the brutalising game of chess.

 4. Tactile pillows. 

 5. Tactile sofas.

6. Tactile beds. 

 7. Tactile shirts and dresses.

 8. Tactile rooms.

 In these tactile rooms, we will have floors and walls made of large tactile boards. Tactile values of mirrors, running water, rocks, metals, brushes, lightly electrified wires, marble, velvet, rugs that will give the bare feet of the male and female dancers varied pleasures.

9. Tactile streets.

10. Tactile theatres.

We will have theatres arranged for Tactilism. Seated spectators will rest their hands on long, running tactile ribbons that will produce tactile sensations with different rhythms. It will also be possible to place these ribbons on small rotating wheels, accompanying them with music and light. 

11. Tactile boards for the improvisation of words in freedom. 

The tactilist will express aloud the sensations that his hands' journey transmits to him. His will be a free-word improvisation, that is, freed from all rhythm, prosody and syntax, an improvisation essential and synthetic and with as little of the human element as possible. The improvising tactilist may be blindfolded, but it is preferable to wrap him in the light of a projector. The new initiates, who have not yet trained their tactile sensibilities, will be blindfolded. But, as for the true tactilists, the full light of a projector is preferable, since darkness has the drawback of concentrating sensitivity into an excessive abstraction.

 The education of the sense of touch.

 1. It will be necessary to keep the hands gloved for many days, during which the brain will attempt to condense in them the desire for varied tactile sensations.

 2. To swim underwater, in the ocean, trying to distinguish tactilely the plaited currents and different temperatures.

 3. Enumerate and recognise every evening, in absolute darkness, all of the objects in the bedroom. It was precisely with giving myself over to this exercise in the underground darkness of a trench in Gorizia, in 1917, that I made my first tactile experiments.

I never claimed to have invented the tactile sensibility, which has already manifested itself in genial forms in the Jongleuse and in the Hors~nature of Rachilde. Other writers and artists had premonitions of tactilism. Moreover, the plastic art of tactilism has been in existence for a long time. My great friend Boccioni, futurist painter and sculptor, felt as a tactilist when he created, in 1919, his plastic ensemble Fusion of a Head and a Window, with materials that are absolute contraries in tactile weight and value: iron, porcelain, and women's hair. 

The Tactilism created by me is clearly distinct from the plastic arts. It has nothing to do with, nothing to gain from, and everything to lose by association with painting or sculpture. It is necessary to avoid, as much as possible in the tactile boards, a variety in colour, which lends itself to plastic impressions. It will be difficult for painters and sculptors, who tend naturally to subordinate tactile values to visual values, to create significant tactile boards. Tactilism seems to me particularly suited to young poets, pianists, typists, and to all erotic, refined, and potent temperaments.

Tactilism, nevertheless, must avoid not only collaboration with plastic arts but also morbid erotomania. It must, simply, have as a goal tactile harmony, and it must indirectly collaborate in the perfecting of spiritual communication between human beings through the epidermis.

The identification of five senses is arbitrary, and one day we will certainly discover and catalogue numerous other senses. Tactilism will contribute to this discovery. F. T. Marinetti